Waynakh Online

Top Menu

  • Archive Documents
  • Bookshelf
  • Chechen Culture
  • ECHR Cases
  • Gallery
  • Lyrics
  • Mp3
  • Poems
  • Videos

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Chechens
    • Who are the Chechens?
    • Tribal Unions and Clans
    • Religion
    • Famous Chechens
      • Chechen Academicians
      • Chechen Commanders
      • Chechen Litterateures
      • Chechen Musicians
      • Chechen Painters
      • Chechen Politicians
      • Chechen Presidents
      • Chechen Sports Men/Women
      • Names from Chechen History
  • Chechnya
    • Administrative Divisions
    • Maps
    • Geography
    • Constitution
    • Flag, Emblem and Anthem
    • Parliament
    • Presidents
    • Demographics
    • Economy
    • Human Rights Violations
    • Refugees
    • History
  • Chechen Language
    • Chechen Alphabet
    • Fairy Tales in Chechen Language (Mp3)
  • News
  • Articles
  • Interviews
  • Contact
  • Archive Documents
  • Bookshelf
  • Chechen Culture
  • ECHR Cases
  • Gallery
  • Lyrics
  • Mp3
  • Poems
  • Videos

logo

Waynakh Online

  • Home
  • Chechens
    • Who are the Chechens?
    • Tribal Unions and Clans
    • Religion
    • Famous Chechens
      • Chechen Academicians
      • Chechen Commanders
      • Chechen Litterateures
      • Chechen Musicians
      • Chechen Painters
      • Chechen Politicians
      • Chechen Presidents
      • Chechen Sports Men/Women
      • Names from Chechen History
  • Chechnya
    • Administrative Divisions
    • Maps
    • Geography
    • Constitution
    • Flag, Emblem and Anthem
    • Parliament
    • Presidents
    • Demographics
    • Economy
    • Human Rights Violations
    • Refugees
    • History
  • Chechen Language
    • Chechen Alphabet
    • Fairy Tales in Chechen Language (Mp3)
  • News
  • Articles
  • Interviews
  • Contact
News
Home›News›ECHR: Russian Authorities Failed to Effectively Investigate Abduction

ECHR: Russian Authorities Failed to Effectively Investigate Abduction

By admin
March 16, 2011
751
0
Share:

On March 15th, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) notified the judgement case of Tsechoyev v. Russia which is related to Ingushetia. The case was about the abduction of an Ingush civilian, his death and uneffective investigation of Russian authorities.

Here is the press release:

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

PRESS RELEASE
no. 213
15.03.11

Russian authorities failed to effectively investigate abduction and killing of detainee

In today’s Chamber judgment in the case Tsechoyev v. Russia (application no. 39358/05), which is not final1, the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been:

A violation of Article 2 (right to life: obligation to conduct an effective investigation) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The case concerned the killing of the applicant’s brother after being abducted from a pre-trial detention centre in Kabardino-Balkaria (Russia) by unknown men in police uniforms.

Principal facts

The applicant, Ruslan Tsechoyev, is a Russian national who was born in 1965 and lives in Sagopshi in the Malgobek district of Ingushetia (Russia).

His brother, Suleyman Tsechoyev, was arrested in the family’s house in Sagopshi on 23 October 1998 on charges of aiding and abetting the kidnapping of Mr K., the relative of a top executive of the oil company Lukoil. According to Ruslan Tsechoyev’s submissions, his brother told him during their meetings that he had been pressured to confess to his involvement in the said abduction of Mr K. and that he had been subjected to beatings.

In the morning of 23 August 1999, a group of four men wearing police uniforms arrived at the detention centre in Nalchik, identifying themselves as officers of the Malgobek district police department and presenting a number of documents authorising Suleyman Tsechoyev’s transfer back to the detention centre in Ingushetia, where he had previously been held. With the agreement of the Nalchik detention centre’s staff, they took Suleyman Tsechoyev away. The next day, his body was found with gunshot wounds to the head.

An investigation into his murder was instituted. A number of important investigative steps were taken immediately, including a ballistic examination of the site of the crime and an autopsy of the body. In September 1999, Ruslan Tsechoyev and his sister were questioned and were granted victim status in the proceedings. Ruslan Tsechoyev named several people who could have been responsible for his brother’s abduction and death, including the former deputy district prosecutor of Malgobek, Mr Ye., who had been in charge of the investigation of the kidnapping of Mr K. and had authorised Suleyman Tsechoyev’s detention in relation to that crime.

The investigators also questioned the staff at the detention centre in Nalchik and the acting prosecutor of the Malgobek district, who told the investigators that he had ordered Suleyman Tsechoyev’s transfer back to Ingushetia on 5 August 1999, but for unknown reasons that order had not been complied with. The investigation established that the documents which had enabled Suleyman Tsechoyev to be kidnapped had been forged and that the people indicated in the documents had not worked at the Malgobek district police department.

In December 1999, a criminal investigation was opened against the former deputy district prosecutor of Malgobek, Mr Ye. He was charged with aiding the murder and kidnapping of Suleyman Tsechoyev, but the charges were subsequently dropped for lack of evidence. In particular, it was established that at the time of the murder he had left the prosecutor’s service and had been in Moscow.
Efforts to identify the men who had taken Suleyman Tsechoyev were unsuccessful. The investigation into his murder was suspended for failure to identify the suspects and reopened on a number of occasions. Ruslan Tsechoyev repeatedly wrote to the Prosecutor General complaining of the ineffectiveness of the investigation.

Complaints, procedure and composition of the Court

Relying, in particular, on Articles 2 (right to life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy), Ruslan Tsechoyev alleged that his brother was killed by State officers, that the authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation of the matter, and that he did not have effective remedies in respect of those alleged violations.

The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 7 November 2005.

Judgment was given by a Chamber of seven, composed as follows:
Christos Rozakis (Greece), President,
Nina Vajić (Croatia),
Dean Spielmann (Luxembourg),
Anatoly Kovler (Russia),
Elisabeth Steiner (Austria),
Khanlar Hajiyev (Azerbaijan),
Sverre Erik Jebens (Norway), Judges,
and also Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar.

Decision of the Court

Article 2 (right to life: obligation to protect)
The Court observed that the parties disagreed as to whether the four men who had abducted Suleyman Tsechoyev were representatives of the State. The domestic investigation had so far produced no conclusive results on the matter besides having established that the men were not officers of the Malgobek police department, as they had claimed. The Court found that the evidence submitted by the parties was not sufficient to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the men who had killed Suleyman Tsechoyev were indeed State agents.

In order to establish whether the State had fulfilled its positive obligation to protect Suleyman Tsechoyev’s life, the Court further had to consider whether the authorities could have foreseen that, by handing him over to the men who had presented themselves as police officers, his life would be at real and immediate risk. The men had presented the relevant documents and the staff of the Nalchik detention centre had followed the routine procedure. While the subsequent investigation had established that the papers were forged, at the time of the transfer the Nalchik detention centre staff had not noticed anything suspicious.

The Court underlined that a situation, where a person who is detained on criminal charges and thus entirely under the authorities’ control could become the victim of a carefully masterminded murder, should be of serious concern to the relevant State bodies and should call for efficient investigative measures aimed at solving the crime. However, the Court did not find that the chain of events leading to Suleyman Tsechoyev’s death could have been foreseeable to the Nalchik detention centre’s officers when they transferred him into the custody of the supposed police officers. Therefore, no obligation to take operational measures to prevent a risk to life had arisen and there had accordingly been no violation of the positive obligation to protect Suleyman Tsechoyev’s right to life under

Article 2. (right to life: obligation to conduct an effective investigation)

As regards the investigation into Suleyman Tsechoyev’s death, the Court noted that not all documents from the investigation file had been disclosed by the Government. Drawing inferences from that conduct, the Court assumed that the materials made available had been selected so as to demonstrate to the maximum extent possible the effectiveness of the investigation in question. The merits of the complaint had therefore to be assessed on the basis of the existing elements in the file.

The Court observed that the criminal investigation had been instituted immediately after the discovery of the body, with a number of important steps taken to establish the circumstances of the events including the questioning of Suleyman Tsechoyev’s family. The fact that the investigation in respect of the former deputy district prosecutor of Malgobek and other people named by Ruslan Tsechoyev who could have been responsible for his brother’s death ended without concrete result was not indicative of any failings as such.

However, the Court found it difficult to ignore the fact that the investigation had failed to elucidate the possible complicity of the law-enforcement staff of the Malgobek district in Suleyman Tsechoyev’s abduction. Having heard the testimony of the Malgobek district prosecutor that he had authorised Mr Tsechoyev’s transfer back to the detention centre in Ingushetia several weeks prior to the abduction, but that for unclear reasons it had not taken place, the investigators had not taken any steps to clarify who had been aware of that decision, whether the corresponding documents had been issued at the Malgobek prosecutor’s office and whether those documents could have been used to forge the papers presented at the Nalchik pre-trial detention centre on the day of the abduction. That led the Court to conclude that the investigation had ultimately been ineffective in that it had failed to follow an obvious line of inquiry to an extent which undermined its ability to establish the circumstances of the case and the person or persons responsible.

The authorities had thus failed to carry out a thorough, objective and impartial analysis of all relevant elements. There had accordingly been a violation of of Article 2 concerning the investigation.

In view of that finding, the Court did not consider it necessary to separately examine the complaint under Article 13.

Article 41
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction) of the Convention, the Court held that Russia was to pay Ruslan Tsechoyev 15,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 2,500 in respect of costs and expenses.

TagsECHRRuslan TsechoyevSuleyman Tsechoyev
Previous Article

A Life Story from Chechnya: Azim

Next Article

Tsechoyev v. Russia

Share:

Related articles More from author

  • ECHR Cases

    Khalitova and Others – Khasuyeva v. Russia

    June 11, 2009
    By admin
  • ECHR Cases

    Isayev and Others v. Russia

    June 23, 2011
    By admin
  • ECHR Cases

    Sadykov v. Russia

    October 23, 2010
    By admin
  • ECHR Cases

    Vitayeva and Others v. Russia

    June 8, 2011
    By admin
  • ECHR Cases

    Dzhabrailov v. Russia

    May 20, 2010
    By admin
  • ECHR Cases

    Dudarovy v. Russia

    February 10, 2011
    By admin

Leave a reply

  • Articles

    “Before the War, I had Toys” – Children of Grozny

  • News

    Chechen Prisoners Subjected to Mass Beatings

  • News

    Mass Abduction in Chechnya

Our Website in Other Languages

                        

Latest Comments

  • Mustafa
    on
    January 30, 2022
    As salam alaikum im from sesinoy we are chechens from turkey can anyone help to find ...

    Tribal Unions and Clans

  • Tumisha
    on
    October 6, 2021
    I'd love to know what my name means...

    Chechen Women Names

  • Zelim
    on
    July 17, 2021
    İm from Turkoy tayp . Turkoy tayp is not racially turk . Our Grandfathers moved to ...

    Tribal Unions and Clans

  • Anter Johnson
    on
    December 10, 2020
    Does anyone have the lyrics in english by any chance, I want to translate this song ...

    Iordanex Oylanaš – Ali Dimaev

  • Noxchi9595
    on
    October 8, 2020
    Yes, it does. Look under Noxcmaxkaxoy number 23. There you have Yeg1ashbatoy

    Tribal Unions and Clans

Find us on Facebook

Categories

Archives

Search

https://youtu.be/LRtf8UENmp8
https://youtu.be/0yiOJCJWZjU
https://youtu.be/o5oU3dXxgSU
https://youtu.be/iDCpqn62bVQ
https://youtu.be/eBaatZVQpQw
https://youtu.be/Ukk7OkjTlOk
https://youtu.be/rBzKuDNnidM
https://youtu.be/4OON0mwLMfM
https://youtu.be/A7YLIm2YC-Y
https://youtu.be/oiymVOUdIxk

Our Partners

Chechenpress
Khaaman
Ichkeria Culture Center in Austria
Qaanuoyn Dosh
World Chechnya Day
Justice for Medet Önlü

Honorary Consulate of the ChRI in Turkey

We are at Instagram

Waynakh Online

Independent Chechen website that publishes news, articles, interviews, historical documents, literary works, photographs, music and videos.


                        

Last Publications

  • March 16, 2020

    Prime Minister Zakayev’s Book Presented in London

  • February 3, 2020

    European Parliament Hosts a Conference Dedicated to Chechnya

  • October 19, 2019

    Akhmed Zakayev’s Book Presented in the House of Commons

  • August 11, 2019

    Subjugate or Exterminate!

  • August 11, 2019

    Chechnya: The Inside Story

Most commented

  • Gallery

    Gallery of Abed Arslan

    By admin
    September 14, 2009
    10
  • Articles

    Gakayev, The Enemy Kadyrov Needs

    By admin
    August 31, 2012
    9
  • Articles

    Sex Slavery and Death Await Women Seized by Kadyrov’s Bandits

    By admin
    August 16, 2011
    8
  • Famous Chechens

    Shamil Salmanovich Basayev

    By admin
    May 18, 2008
    6
  • Home
  • Contact
2000-2022 © Waynakh Online | Powered by Chechen Media