{"id":353,"date":"2009-05-09T14:09:29","date_gmt":"2009-05-09T21:09:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/?p=353"},"modified":"2009-05-09T14:09:29","modified_gmt":"2009-05-09T21:09:29","slug":"chitayev-and-chitayev-v-russia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/2009\/05\/chitayev-and-chitayev-v-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"Chitayev and Chitayev v. Russia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The ECHR case of Chitayev and Chitayev v. Russia (application no. 59334\/00).<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">..<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: right;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">44<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"text-align: right;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">18.1.2007<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Press release issued  by the Registrar<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">CHAMBER JUDGMENT<\/span><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><br \/>\nCHITAYEV AND CHITAYEV v. RUSSIA<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The European Court of Human  Rights has today notified in writing its Chamber judgment<a style=\"text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/cmiskp.echr.coe.int\/tkp197\/viewhbkm.asp?sessionId=23366699&amp;skin=hudoc-pr-en&amp;action=html&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649&amp;key=43306&amp;highlight=chechen#02000001\"><span class=\"Footnote-0020Reference--Char\"><span class=\"Footnote-0020Reference--Char\" style=\"font-size: 10pt;\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/span><\/span><\/a> in the case of <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Chitayev and Chitayev v. Russia <\/span>(application  no. 59334\/00). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court held unanimously  that there had been:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a<span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> violation<\/span> <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">of Article 3<\/span> (prohibition of torture) of the European Convention on Human Rights  concerning the treatment of the applicants while in detention;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">violation  of Article 3<\/span> as regards the absence of an effective investigation  into the applicants\u2019 allegations of torture;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">violation  of Article 5<\/span> (right to liberty and security) of the Convention  on account of the applicants\u2019 unacknowledged detention;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">violation  of Article 5 \u00a7 4<\/span> (right to have lawfulness of detention decided  speedily by a court);<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">violation  of Article 5 \u00a7 1 (c) <\/span>(lawfulness of detention);<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">violation  of Article 5 \u00a7 3 <\/span>(right to trial within a reasonable time or  to release pending trial);<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">violation  of Article 5 \u00a7 5 <\/span>(enforceable right to compensation);<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>a <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">violation  of Article 13<\/span> (right to an effective remedy); and,<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-left: 36pt; text-indent: -18pt; font-family: 'Symbol','Arial'; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman','Arial';\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-family: 'Symbol','Arial';\"> <\/span>no<span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> <\/span> failure<span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> <\/span> to comply with<span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> Article 38 \u00a7 1 (a)<\/span> (obligation to furnish necessary facilities  for the examination of the case).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Under Article 41 (just  satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicants 35,000 euros (EUR),  each, for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 7,629.90, jointly, for costs  and expenses. (The judgment is available only in English.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">1.\u00a0\u00a0Principal facts<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The applicants, Arbi Chitayev,  and his brother, Adam Chitayev, are Russian nationals who were born  in 1964 and 1967 respectively. It appears that Arbi Chitayev now lives  in Germany and that Adam Chitayev lives in the Irkutsk Region (Russia).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The facts of the case,  particularly those surrounding the period of the applicants\u2019 detention,  are partially disputed by the parties.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">According to the applicants,  following the outbreak of hostilities in Chechnya in 1999 between the  Russian armed forces and <a name=\"HIT1\"><\/a>Chechen rebel fighters, they moved their families  and valuables to their parent\u2019s house in the town of Achkhoy-Martan. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Between  January and April 2000 the house was searched by officers from the Temporary  Office of the Interior of the Achkhoy-Martan District (\u201cthe Achknoy-Martan  VOVD\u201d) a number of times without a warrant being produced. Numerous  household electrical items and personal documents belonging to the applicants  were seized. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Following  one of the searches, on 12\u00a0April 2000, the brothers were told they had  been arrested. They were then taken into detention at the Achkhoy-Martan  VOVD, where they were held until 28 April 2000 in unheated, damp cells  with no toilets.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">While  in custody, they were interrogated about the activities of the <a name=\"HIT2\"><\/a>Chechen  rebel fighters and about kidnappings for ransom, but denied their involvement  in any crimes. The applicants alleged that they were ill-treated. In  particular, they alleged that: they were given electric shocks, forced  to stand for a long time in a stretched position, with their feet and  hands spread wide apart; that they had their arms twisted; that they  were beaten with rubber truncheons and plastic bottles filled with water;  that they were strangled with adhesive tape, with a cellophane bag and  a gas mask; that dogs were set on them and that parts of their skin  were torn away with pliers. Adam Chitayev claimed he was also beaten  on his genitals and threatened with shooting.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">On  28 April 2000 the applicants were transferred to the Chernokozovo Detention  Centre ( \u201cthe Chernokozovo SIZO\u201d) where they were beaten on arrival.  They were not medically examined on arrival, in contravention of the  relevant legislation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">They  alleged that, there, they were again interrogated and tortured to force  them to make false confessions: they were beaten, threatened, strangled  and subjected to electric shocks and their fingers and toes were squashed  with mallets or a door of a safe and their hands and feet tied behind  their backs (\u201cswallow\u201d<span class=\"Ju-005fPara--Char\" style=\"font-style: italic;\"> <\/span>position).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Their  lawyer was only once given access to them and was only allowed to ask  them how they were in Russian and in the presence of a police officer.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">On  19\u00a0September 2000 the applicants were brought back to Achkhoy-Martan  and informed that they had been charged with kidnapping and participation  in an unlawful armed group. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">On  5\u00a0October 2000 they were released.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">On  6 October 2000 the applicants were medically examined. Among other things,  they were found to have numerous injuries to their heads and bodies  and to be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. The doctors  noted that the traumas and other medical conditions had apparently been  sustained in the Chernokozovo SIZO between April and October 2000.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">On  9\u00a0October 2000 the prosecutor\u2019s office informed the applicants that  criminal proceedings against them had been discontinued as their involvement  in the imputed offences had not been proved. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">From  12 April 2000 onwards the applicants\u2019 relatives applied repeatedly  to various official bodies (but not a court) concerning the searches  in their house and seizure of their property. They also made applications  concerning the applicants\u2019 arrest and detention. After the applicants  had been released, they joined their relatives in those efforts. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fH-005fA\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Ju-005fH-005fA--Char\" style=\"font-weight: normal;\">The  prosecutor\u2019s office refused to bring criminal proceedings in connection  with the applicants\u2019 allegations of ill-treatment during their detention  from 12 April until 5\u00a0October 2000. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">According to the Government,  on 12 April 2000 the applicants\u2019 house was \u201cinspected\u201d (<span class=\"Ju-005fPara--Char\" style=\"font-style: italic;\">\u043e\u0441\u043c\u043e\u0442\u0440<\/span>) by a police officer of the Achkhoy-Martan VOVD.  During that \u201cinspection\u201d, a number of items had been found that,  in the Government\u2019s submission, \u201ccould be indicative of the applicants\u2019  participation in illegal armed groups\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Ju-005fPara\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-indent: 0pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">According  to the Government, on 17 April 2000 the prosecutor\u2019s office of the  Achkhoy-Martan District instituted criminal proceedings against the  applicants and they were placed in detention in the Achkhoy-Martan VOVD.  They were transferred to the Chernokozovo SIZO on 26 April 2000.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">On 29 October 2003 a decision  discontinuing the criminal proceedings against the applicants was quashed  by the republican prosecutor\u2019s office and the case forwarded for additional  investigation. Apparently the proceedings are still pending. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 24pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">2.\u00a0\u00a0Procedure and composition of the Court<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The application was lodged  on 19 July 2000 and declared partly admissible on 30 June 2005.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Judgment was given by a  Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Christos <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rozakis<\/span> (Greek), <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">President<\/span>,<br \/>\nLoukis <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Loucaides<\/span> (Cypriot),<br \/>\nFran\u00e7oise <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Tulkens<\/span> (Belgian),<br \/>\nNina <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Vaji\u0107<\/span> (Croatian),<br \/>\nAnatoli <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kovler<\/span> (Russian),<br \/>\nElisabeth <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Steiner<\/span> (Austrian),<br \/>\nKhanlar <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Hajiyev<\/span> (Azerbaijani), <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">judges<\/span>,<\/p>\n<p>and also S\u00f8ren <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Nielsen<\/span>, <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Section Registrar<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">3.\u00a0\u00a0Summary of the judgment<\/span><a style=\"text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/cmiskp.echr.coe.int\/tkp197\/viewhbkm.asp?sessionId=23366699&amp;skin=hudoc-pr-en&amp;action=html&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649&amp;key=43306&amp;highlight=chechen#02000002\"><span class=\"Footnote-0020Reference--Char\"><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Complaints<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The applicants alleged, in particular, that they were  tortured and unlawfully arrested and detained by the Russian authorities  and that there was no effective investigation into those events. They  also complained that their home was unlawfully searched and their property  unlawfully seized. They relied on Articles 3, 5, 8 (right to respect  for private life and home) and 13 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1  (protection of property) to the Convention.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Decision of the Court<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court found that the  applicants had failed to exhaust domestic remedies and that it was unable  to consider the merits of the complaints under Article 8 and Article  1 of Protocol. No. 1. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 3<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Detention conditions<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court held unanimously that it was unable to consider  the merits of the applicants\u2019 complaint concerning the conditions  of their detention, as it had been lodged out of time (more than six  months after they were released).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Torture<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court noted that the medical documents drawn up  the day after the applicants\u2019 release confirmed the presence of various  injuries. The Russian Government did not at any time contest the authenticity  of those documents or argue that the injuries had been sustained before  or after the applicants\u2019 detention. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Having regard to the applicants\u2019  consistent and detailed allegations, corroborated by the medical documents,  the Court concluded that the Government had not satisfactorily established  that the applicants\u2019 injuries were caused otherwise than by the treatment  they underwent while in detention.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">As to the seriousness of  the acts of ill-treatment, the Court found in the applicants\u2019 case  that their suffering was particularly serious and cruel, which amounted  to torture, in violation of Article 3.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Investigation into allegations of torture<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court considered that the medical evidence and  the applicants\u2019 complaints together raised a reasonable suspicion  that their injuries could have been caused by representatives of the  State. Russia was therefore under an obligation to conduct an effective  investigation satisfying the requirements of Article 3. However, the  authorities failed to carry out a thorough and effective investigation.  There had therefore been a violation of Article 3.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 5<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Given that the applicants  were detained by the authorities on 12 April 2000 and the fact that  the Government provided no explanation concerning their detention between  12 and 16\u00a0April 2000, or any documents by way of justification, the Court  concluded that, during that period, the applicants were held in unacknowledged  detention in compete disregard of the safeguards enshrined in Article  5, which constituted a particularly grave violation of Article 5.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 5 \u00a7 4<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court found that the  applicants had been unable to take proceedings to challenge the lawfulness  of their detention in custody between 17\u00a0April and 4\u00a0October 2000 (the  Government acknowledged that the courts in the <a name=\"HIT3\"><\/a>Chechen Republic had  been inoperative until November\u00a02000) in violation of Article 5 \u00a7 4.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 5 \u00a7 1 (c) <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court found one period  of the applicants\u2019 detention to be lawful and one unlawful, in violation  of Article 5 \u00a7 1 (c).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 5 \u00a7 2<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court did not find  it necessary to examine the Russian authorities\u2019 compliance with the  requirements of Article 5 \u00a7\u00a02.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 5 \u00a7 3. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Given that, during the  relevant period of their remand in custody, the applicants were unable  to apply for their release and that no evidence justifying their continued  detention had been submitted, the Court concluded that they were denied  the right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial,  in violation of Article 5 \u00a7 3.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 5 \u00a7 5<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Given that the judicial  system in Chechnya was not functioning until at least November 2000,  and the fact that neither of the decisions ordering the discontinuance  of the criminal proceedings against the applicants was final, as well  as the fact that the criminal proceedings were still pending, the Court  found that applicants had been prevented from seeking compensation for  their detention in violation of Article 5 \u00a7 5.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 13<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court found that the  applicants had been denied an effective domestic remedy in respect of  the ill-treatment by the police, in violation of Article 13, but that  no separate issue arose in respect of Article 13 in connection with  Article 5. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article 38 \u00a7 1 (a)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt; text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Court found no failure  on the part of the Russian Government to comply with Article 38 \u00a7 1  (a). <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The ECHR case of Chitayev and Chitayev v. Russia (application no. 59334\/00).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-echr-cases"],"views":2864,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":355,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353\/revisions\/355"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}