{"id":9389,"date":"2010-10-28T16:20:20","date_gmt":"2010-10-28T13:20:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/?p=9389"},"modified":"2010-10-28T16:20:20","modified_gmt":"2010-10-28T13:20:20","slug":"norvec-helsinki-komitesi%e2%80%99nden-cagri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/2010\/10\/norvec-helsinki-komitesi%e2%80%99nden-cagri\/","title":{"rendered":"Norve\u00e7 Helsinki Komitesi\u2019nden \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

Norve\u00e7 Helsinki Komitesi<\/a>, Rusya\u2019ya iadesi g\u00fcndemde olan Ali \u0130bragimov ve Anzor Chentiev isimli iki \u00c7e\u00e7en s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmac\u0131n\u0131n durumuyla ilgili olarak Slovakya Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na bir dilek\u00e7e ile ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n

\n

Komitenin ba\u015fvurusu:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

NORVE\u00c7 HELS\u0130NK\u0130 KOM\u0130TES\u0130<\/span>
\nDEN NORSKE HELSINGFORSKOMITE<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kime:<\/strong><\/span> Bayan Lucie Zhitnianska<\/strong>
\nSlovakya Cumhuriyeti Adalet Bakan\u0131
\ntlacove@justice.sk<\/a><\/p>\n

Kopyas\u0131:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Bay <\/strong>Dick Marty<\/strong>
\nRaport\u00f6r
\nAvrupa Konseyi Parlamenterler Meclisi (PACE)<\/p>\n

Bayan <\/strong>Heidi Hautala<\/strong>
\nAvrupa Parlamentosu \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Alt Komitesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131<\/p>\n

Bay Thomas Hammerberg<\/strong>
\nAvrupa Konseyi \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Komiseri<\/p>\n

Bayan Svetlana Gannushkina<\/strong>
\nSivil Destek Komitesi Lideri
\n\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Merkezi Memoria Y\u00f6netim Kurulu \u00fcyesi<\/p>\n

27 Ekim 2010<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130ki s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmac\u0131n\u0131n Slovakya\u2019dan Rusya\u2019ya iadesi konusunda.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Norve\u00e7 Helsinki Komitesi (NHK), Avrupa G\u00fcvenlik ve \u0130\u015fbirli\u011fi Te\u015fkilat\u0131\u2019n\u0131n (AG\u0130T) kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 co\u011frafi alanda insan haklar\u0131n\u0131 geli\u015ftirmek ve korumak amac\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Genel insan haklar\u0131 g\u00f6revimizden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc, NHK, g\u00f6\u00e7 ve s\u0131\u011f\u0131nma konular\u0131 ile belli ba\u015fl\u0131 \u00fclkeler ve b\u00f6lgelerdeki geli\u015fmeler konular\u0131na odaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Rusya Federasyonu\u2019nun vatanda\u015flar\u0131 Bay Anzor Chadidovich Chentiev ve Bay Ali Nurdinovich \u0130bragimov\u2019un iadeleri i\u00e7in Slovakya\u2019ya yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru ve akabinde geli\u015fen yerel ve Avrupa\u2019daki hukuksal s\u00fcreci ilgiyle takip ettik. Her ikisi i\u00e7in de Slovak mahkemeleri Rusya\u2019n\u0131n talebinin kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funu kanaat getirmi\u015f ve bu ki\u015filerin iade edilebileceklerine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Bu karar Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi\u2019nce de onaylanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Son mahkeme karar\u0131nda, Rusya\u2019n\u0131n bu iki ki\u015finin Rusya\u2019ya teslim edilmesi halinde adil bi\u00e7imde yarg\u0131lanacaklar\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00fcm cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lmayacaklar\u0131 \u015feklinde diplomatik garantiler verdi\u011fine de\u011finilerek, s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmac\u0131lar\u0131n \u015fikayetlerini reddetmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca Rusya\u2019da \u00f6l\u00fcm cezalar\u0131n\u0131n ertelendi\u011fini ve olas\u0131 hak ihlalleri halinde ikilinin Avrupa Konvansiyonu kapsam\u0131ndaki haklar\u0131na uygun olarak yeniden mahkemeye ba\u015fvuruda bulunabilece\u011fine de\u011finilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen, Slovakya\u2019n\u0131n halen dosyalar\u0131 yeniden inceleme imkan\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r ve biz, Slovakya adalet yetkililerini bu iki ki\u015finin Rusya\u2019ya s\u0131n\u0131rd\u0131\u015f\u0131 etmemeleri konusunda \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131da bulunuyoruz. Zira mahkemenin son karar\u0131, A\u0130HM\u2019de “\u00c7e\u00e7en davalar\u0131” olarak an\u0131lan Rusya\u2019n\u0131n \u00c7e\u00e7enya\u2019da konvansiyonun 2.,3.,6. ve 11. maddelerini -ki bunlar ya\u015fam hakk\u0131, i\u015fkence ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalmama hakk\u0131 ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131d\u0131r- ciddi, yayg\u0131n ve sistematik olarak ihlal etti\u011fi \u015feklindeki yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Dahas\u0131 Rusya Federasyonu Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan verilen iddianame sadece tek bir \u015fahs\u0131n tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayanmakta, \u00fcstelik bu \u015fah\u0131sta daha sonra beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fkence alt\u0131nda verdi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015f durumdad\u0131r; bu durumda mahkemenin mevcut karar\u0131 mahkemenin Avrupa Konseyi \u00fcyesi \u00fclkelerde i\u015fkencenin ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelelerin \u00f6nlenmesine ili\u015fkin \u00e7abalar\u0131yla z\u0131tl\u0131k g\u00f6stermektedir. Bu ba\u011flamda, Slovakya makamlar\u0131na, 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda Rusya\u2019n\u0131n Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri\u2019ne verdi\u011fi diplomatik g\u00fcvencelere m\u00fcteakip Guantanamo\u2019da tutulan yedi Rus vatanda\u015f\u0131n\u0131n iade edilmesi olay\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irmelerini \u00f6neriyoruz. Zira Mart 2007 tarihli Human Rights Watch raporunda iade edilen bu yedi \u015fahs\u0131n hepsinin Rus hapishanelerinde i\u015fkence g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belgelendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Avrupa Konseyi Parlamenterler Meclisi\u2019nin 2010 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki 1738 say\u0131l\u0131 sonu\u00e7 bildirgesinde “en ciddi ve hassas konu insan haklar\u0131n\u0131n ve hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn korunamamas\u0131d\u0131r” ifadelerine yer verilerek Kuzey Kafkasya\u2019daki durumun vahameti tasvir edilmi\u015ftir. Bu b\u00f6lgede insanlar\u0131n ortadan kaybolmas\u0131 ve yarg\u0131s\u0131z infazlar halen ciddi bir problemdir.<\/p>\n

Ayr\u0131ca, Norve\u00e7\u2019te s\u0131\u011f\u0131nma ba\u015fvurusunda bulunan bir \u00c7e\u00e7en\u2019in iadesi i\u00e7in Rusya taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan talebin Oslo Temyiz Mahkemesi\u2019nce 26 A\u011fustos 2009 tarihinde reddedildi\u011fini belirtmek istiyoruz. Rusya taraf\u0131ndan Kafkasya\u2019daki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmayla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 benzeri iade taleplerinin \u0130sve\u00e7 ve di\u011fer baz\u0131 Avrupa devletlerince reddedilmi\u015ftir. Verilerimize g\u00f6re Avrupa devletleri taraf\u0131ndan Rusya\u2019n\u0131n iade talebine verilen tek olumlu yan\u0131t Gasayev olay\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130nsan haklar\u0131 savunucular\u0131n\u0131n ciddi tepkileri alt\u0131nda \u0130spanya iadeyi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, bu olay\u0131n Slovakya mahkemesinde ele al\u0131nan iki \u00c7e\u00e7en\u2019in durumundan farkl\u0131 \u00f6zellikleri vard\u0131.<\/p>\n

Dikkat \u00e7ekilmesi gereken benzeri iade talepleri olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, Rusya Federasyonu, A\u0130HM\u2019deki “\u00c7e\u00e7en davalar\u0131” kararlar\u0131nda belirtilen hususlara tam olarak uyana kadar genel olarak biz Kuzey Kafkasya\u2019daki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalarla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 bireylerin iade edilmelerine ili\u015fkin taleplerine \u015fiddetle kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131z. Hat\u0131rlatmal\u0131y\u0131z ki, Avrupa\u2019daki kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7leri ile Rusya Federasyonu kolluk g\u00fc\u00e7leri aras\u0131nda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 bir i\u015fbirli\u011fi yap\u0131labilmesinin \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131 A\u011fustos 2009\u2019da Avrupa Konseyi Parlamenterler Meclisi\u2019nce sunulan “Avrupa Konseyi \u00fcye \u00fclkeler ceza adalet sisteminde siyasi ama\u00e7l\u0131 hak ihlalleri iddialar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131k raporda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere Rusya Federasyonu\u2019nun “hukuksal yokluk”la m\u00fccadelesi i\u00e7in ciddi yarg\u0131sal reformlar yapmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Sayg\u0131lar\u0131mla,<\/p>\n

Bjorn Engesland<\/strong>
\nGenel Sekreter<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Norve\u00e7 Helsinki Komitesi, Rusya\u2019ya iadesi g\u00fcndemde olan Ali \u0130bragimov ve Anzor Chentiev isimli iki \u00c7e\u00e7en s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmac\u0131n\u0131n durumuyla ilgili olarak Slovakya Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na bir dilek\u00e7e ile ba\u015fvuruda bulundu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1682,1681,2070,2071],"views":5112,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9389"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9389"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9391,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9389\/revisions\/9391"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.waynakh.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}